The AWEA Blog: Into the Wind


Robert Bryce, King of the NIMBYs

Robert Bryce, of the Koch Industries- and Exxon-funded Manhattan Institute, continues firing off anti-wind diatribes every day or two.  His latest, in the Huffington Post, breaks some new ground, advising Gov. Jerry Brown (D-CA) to beware of upsetting local citizens who oppose solar and wind power projects.

It's fascinating reading, not least because Mr. Bryce, who speaks so approvingly of citizens opposing energy projects, has been a longtime devotee of nuclear power.  Perhaps he is just running scared--it's front-page news around the world that following the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan, Germany is phasing out nuclear power and intends to rely on offshore wind for a sizable chunk of its electricity. That decision followed massive demonstrations by: citizens opposing (nuclear) energy projects.  Obviously, to ally oneself with NIMBYs at a time when infrastructure projects of all types face growing criticism from self-interested local groups is to grasp a double-edged sword.

Or perhaps he is pulling our collective leg. In an opinion article criticizing wind and solar power not too long ago and speaking favorably of nuclear, Mr. Bryce actually cited E.F. Schumacher, who coined the phrase "small is beautiful." One blogger, commenting on the article, astutely noted that Schumacher, a fierce critic of nuclear, called it "an ethical, spiritual, and metaphysical monstrosity."

As for the reality behind Mr. Bryce's screed, it's difficult to say how much credence to give it. Certainly there are more groups in more places expressing concern about wind (and solar) projects than there were a decade ago, but in large part, that is probably because there are so many more wind projects.  The numbers don't lie--during the 2000s, wind projects around the world expanded by more than 1,000 percent, from 17,000 megawatts (MW) installed at the end of 2000 to 197,000 at the end of 2010.  Clearly, someone out there likes wind power.

Who would that be? Well, according to all the polling we've seen, pretty much everyone. Our most recent poll, in the Presidentially pivotal state of Iowa--but also the state that is getting a higher percentage of electricity generation from wind than any other (20 percent)--shows a mere 85 percent of voters having a favorable opinion of wind companies, including 62 percent "very favorable." Other polling data, both national and state, tell the same story.

And why would that be? My guess is because most people understand that our society needs energy and would prefer that it come from an energy source like wind power that requires no mining or drilling for fuel, produces no air pollution, water pollution, or hazardous waste, uses virtually no water, revitalizes rural communities, and creates new manufacturing jobs.

More reading:

Fact check: Bryce out to lunch with latest anti-wind broadside, August 3, 2011

Public Opinion Watch: Iowa voters overwhelmingly back wind energy, July 1, 2011

Public Opinion Watch: Wisconsin says "Yes!" to wind power, April 25, 2011
Despite noisy few, public favors wind, March 4, 2011
Indiana poll finds overwhelming bipartisan support for wind energy, as Legislature weighs 10% requirement, February 28, 2011


2 responses

  1. Seilertechco August 11, 2011 10:38AM
    The answer is not a choice between the two... but both. We diversify in every direction and expand opportunity abundantly (not necessarily deregulating). Use subsities to incentivise entrepreneurs for a change. For that matter, change the monetary system away from debt so when we make entrepreneurial investment in value added enterprise, it is not assured bankrupcy. Remember, 95 % of new business fails in the first five years.
  2. Raúl E. Viñas August 10, 2011 09:13AM
    Well, surely some thirty yeas ago Mr Bryce wouldn´t care about wind, with all those big nukes under construction at the time. Now, with no new nuclear in sight but still having federeal guarantees for its future installation, the pro nuclear have to play their cards. To avoid trouble, wind advocates and developers have to be very carefull in siting. In my country Uruguay, we are just begining to develop the wind resource that is already 1.5% of the installed capacity. Anyway, we have already drop a few proposals to install wind farms close to tourist places and protected views. Actually a new bid for 150MW is under way

Please Enter Comments