Opinion: Wind turbines are good for our health
The following letter to the editor appeared in the Eau Claire, Wis., newspaper The Country Today and is reprinted here with permission of the author.
To the editor:
A letter to the editor on Feb. 8 commended the Brown County Board of Health for recent resolutions requesting compensation for families living near the wind energy project in the town of Glenmore.
Though many hours have been spent researching a “sickness” (coined “wind turbine syndrome”), the medical community has yet to discover any scientific basis for recognizing it as a valid illness. Epidemiological studies such as those from Ontario, Oregon and Massachusetts all say the same thing — wind turbines annoy people who don’t want them. Our state emergency funding should be used for real and tangible disasters, not for “believed” or “perceived” illnesses claimed by a handful of angry wind energy opponents. The town of Glenmore hosted the first large wind energy project in Wisconsin 15 years ago, consisting of two utility-scale turbines. Local farmers, neighbors, schoolchildren and the press all rallied around Gov. Tommy Thompson at the dedication ceremony. It was a celebration of innovative technology and homegrown power. No one complained and no one got sick. But when more turbines were proposed a few years later, some neighbors were convinced they would be adversely affected and their property values would plummet. At one town board meeting, the people inside became so unruly that the chairman called the sheriff’s department to restore order. It’s no surprise the same people who were claiming they would be affected are now calling themselves “victims.” This is a desperate and politically driven attempt to further delay state legislation on wind siting rules for community projects like Shirley’s eight turbines.
An effective tactic used by wind opponents is to claim that more studies are needed. It’s a smart argument, as it shifts the burden of proof. Proving that something doesn’t happen or will never happen is a logical and scientific impossibility, no matter how many studies are done.
It’s your right to be annoyed by the sight of wind turbines and to have a certain amount of local control, but it’s not your right to impede progressive and sound energy policy. Wind turbines are good for our health. They don’t use imported fossil fuels, water or emit pollution. And despite cleverly planted rumors, they are safe, make lots of electricity that stays within state lines and provide good jobs in many sectors.
Midwest Renewable Energy Association
President, RENEW Wisconsin board of directors
Review of wind turbine sound studies gives debate needed balance, February 28, 2012
Anti-wind-farm "astroturfers" in Australia, February 27, 2012
NBC4's 'iReporter' lacks context on wind turbine sound, February 14, 2012
Fact check: Bryce misleads again on land, sound, resource use, January 31, 2012
Massachusetts clears wind of health effects after independent experts review evidence, January 20, 2012
Opinion: Dr. W. David Colby: Turbines and health, December 2, 2011
Canadian researchers: No direct link between wind turbines and adverse health impacts, November 29, 2011
Wind power: A quiet solution to climate change, June 27, 2011
Sierra Club Canada 1.1: Time to confront anti-wind fear campaign, June 15, 2011
Environmental Defence (Canada): 'No basis' for health impact claims, June 6, 2011
Sierra Club Canada: Time to confront anti-wind disinformation campaign, June 3, 2011
WHO guidelines on sound are ... guidelines, March 28, 2011
Scientists, doctor weigh on wind and health, November 30, 2010
Wind Turbines and Health, fact sheet
Maine physician: distortion in anti-wind health claims, November 3, 2010
Australian health agency: Turbine sound has no health effect, July 6, 2010
UK report debunks wind turbine syndrome, June 9, 2010
Wind gets clean bill of health from Ontario, May 20, 2010
Expert panel concludes wind turbine sounds not harmful to human health, December 15, 2009